Green reviews are from users who graded the move a B or higher.
Black reviews are from users who graded a movie between a B- and a C-.
Red reviews are from users who graded the movie a D+ or lower.
|
|
| Passable as a rental. Why did Hanks phone in his performance? - Janazz |
|
Howard can't direct traffic but McKellen pulls it from the fire - macphisto6 |
|
WORST FILM OF 2006 FOR SURE. LANGDON IS AN IDIOT - movieman20062007 |
|
|
| good twists but dragged on a bit - racer2235 |
|
Worst movie of 2006! - Yellow Jacket |
|
Hanks and Howard hit career lows; A plodding, epic-sized mess. - FullEyes |
|
|
| A decent thriller, not worth the hype though - Rygar1126 |
|
Gets better every time. - Self Inc. |
|
If you want to enjoy this movie, dont read the book. - Silverflicks |
|
|
| Like most say: The book is better. Still pretty good. - mahmite |
|
Abysmal. Easily the worst movie of 2006. - Marley209 |
|
Supporting cast shines, despite Howard's uninspired direction - Draxhall |
|
|
| Long and dull, probably cause it's too close to the book. - weekendwarrior |
|
This sucked. Predictable, Stupid, Offensive; Langdon was an idiot - movieman1234567890 |
|
gr8 supp. cast, tom & audrey lack chemistry. good but letdown. - moviedude |
|
|
| Liked it better on second viewing. Very interesting movie. - SolC9 |
|
Entertaining, but not as good as the book - latigo2011 |
|
I enjoyed it immensly. - movieman |
|
|
| Entertaining movie w/ very good perfs by Mckellen and Bettany. - rodrino |
|
Just like National Treasure, but slow, boring and not as funny. - The EZ1 |
|
|
